On Sunday night, the National Geographic Channel broadcast the programme Stonehenge Decoded which I blogged about a few weeks back. It was a two-hour programme, and I said if I didn’t like it, I’d switch over halfway, and watch NCIS.But, after only ten minutes, I decided that Agent Gibbs & co. could wait till NCIS re-runs. It really did give some new ideas on the stones, not just rehashed old ones.
Professor Mike Parker Pearson … who’d make a pretty good TV presenter, if he ever got tired of professing … produced a lucid and plausible, not too fanciful theory. To put it as concisely as I can, he thought Stonehenge was dedicated to the dead, and its near neighbour, Woodhenge to the living. The dividing line between the two domains was the Cursus, a shallow ditch running in a straight line nearby. Nobody really knows its original purpose, but the Professor’s idea is the best one I’ve heard so far.
Even if you don’t subscribe to the theories, I think you’d agree they were well presented. There was some excellent photography, and actors re-enacting how it was thought the stones were brought over 30 miles from the Marlborough Downs, and how they’re thought to have built Stonehenge and worshipped the sun there and at Woodhenge. He also used his recent finds to reinforce his points.
The narration was by actor Donald Sutherland, who gave it just the right mix of gravitas without sounding too schoolmasterly about it.
Of course, I’m not saying the theories are correct; no one can say that. But, they’re the best ones I’ve heard for quite a while.

I thought Stonehenge was built by the Druids for nature worship… and maybe a sacrifice or two? There was one theory that it also served as a burial yard for a former king (legend attached it to Uther Pendragon, Aurthur’s father, but in reality who knows). What about the theory that the stones came from Wales?
By: Pammy Girl on June 5, 2008
at 1:07 am
A common misconception … but Stonehenge predates the Druids by about 2000 years! The Druid theory was put forward by John Aubrey in the 17th Century, with no facts whatever to back it up, and it’s taken years to dispel it.
Nevertheless, it has been ‘claimed’ by ‘new age’ Druids, who bear little resemblance to Celtic priests encountered during the Roman invasion who. according to Tacitus, were a pretty bloodthirsty lot.
I did note that no mention was made in the programme of the ‘bluestones’, which did indeed come from Wales (they found a sunken bluestone in the Bristol Channel) … probably that was outside Prof. Parker Pearson’s remit.
By: travelrat on June 5, 2008
at 11:35 am
I saw the program too and thought it was excellent. Food for thought!
By: Selma on June 6, 2008
at 3:10 am
For the dead, maybe, how about the design of the final stone monument , that was built by the living, to an exact plan…
By: sarsen56 on June 17, 2008
at 6:07 pm
Well, certainly the layout suggests a knowledge of mathematics that many people used to think didn’t exist at the time… but then, so do the Pyramids, the Cuszco Lines, etc.
By: travelrat on June 17, 2008
at 6:56 pm
[...] related posts: (automatically generated)Stonehenge Television Programme Part DeuxRevelation?Times have changed…Risks turn into rewards for Raiders’ [...]
By: Another Stonehenge Programme « Travelrat’s Travels on June 5, 2009
at 9:23 am